QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress bans AI chatbots in children's toys—but without evidence of harm.

H.R. 8382 — To prohibit the manufacture and conveyance of certain products for children that incorporate an artificial intelligence chatbot, and for other purposes. · Filed by Blake Moore (R-UT) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 20, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Child Safety Regulation / AI Product…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits manufacturers from selling toys and child care products that contain AI chatbots to children, effective 180 days after enactment. Violations are treated as Consumer Product Safety Act breaches, subject to CPSC enforcement and penalties. The bill does not restrict parental choice or adult products, only the commercial supply chain for children's items.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a straightforward consumer-protection measure that uses the CPSA enforcement framework to restrict a specific product category (AI-chatbot toys) from the children's market. It is not a tax provision, subsidy, or deregulation — it is a categorical prohibition justified on child-safety grounds.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not define 'artificial intelligence chatbot' with precision beyond the NAIA 2020 definitions, creating potential ambiguity about what interactive features trigger the ban (e.g., does a toy with pre-recorded voice responses or simple decision trees count as a chatbot?).
  • No exemption for educational or therapeutic AI products, meaning speech-therapy toys or autism-support chatbots would be prohibited if they meet the statutory definition, potentially harming children with developmental needs.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

toy manufacturers without AI-chatbot product lines (competitive advantage via market restriction); child-safety advocacy organizations (regulatory validation of their concerns); CPSC (expanded enforcement authority and budget justification)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record