QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress bans AI chatbots in children's toys—but without evidence of harm.

H.R. 8382 — To prohibit the manufacture and conveyance of certain products for children that incorporate an artificial intelligence chatbot, and for other purposes. · Filed by Blake Moore (R-UT) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 20, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Child Safety Regulation / AI Product…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits manufacturers from selling toys and child care products that contain AI chatbots to children, effective 180 days after enactment. Violations are treated as Consumer Product Safety Act breaches, subject to CPSC enforcement and penalties. The bill does not restrict parental choice or adult products, only the commercial supply chain for children's items.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a straightforward consumer-protection measure that uses the CPSA enforcement framework to restrict a specific product category (AI-chatbot toys) from the children's market. It is not a tax provision, subsidy, or deregulation — it is a categorical prohibition justified on child-safety grounds.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not define 'artificial intelligence chatbot' with precision beyond the NAIA 2020 definitions, creating potential ambiguity about what interactive features trigger the ban (e.g., does a toy with pre-recorded voice responses or simple decision trees count as a chatbot?).
  • No exemption for educational or therapeutic AI products, meaning speech-therapy toys or autism-support chatbots would be prohibited if they meet the statutory definition, potentially harming children with developmental needs.
  • The 180-day implementation window is tight for manufacturers to redesign product lines, potentially creating supply-chain disruption and inventory write-offs for companies with existing AI-chatbot toy pipelines.
  • Enforcement is delegated to the CPSC under Section 19 of the CPSA, which carries civil penalties and potential criminal liability; the bill does not specify penalty levels or safe-harbor provisions for good-faith compliance efforts.
  • The bill does not address imported products already in inventory or in transit; retroactive application could create legal disputes over goods manufactured before enactment but sold after the 180-day window.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill protects children from potential harms of unregulated AI chatbot interaction (privacy, developmental risk, algorithmic bias) by removing these products from the market — a concrete public-health benefit. However, it also restricts parental choice and the availability of a technology some families may find beneficial, and it does so without evidence-based findings or a public record of harm, which raises transparency concerns about regulatory overreach.

Who stands to gain

  • toy manufacturers without AI-chatbot product lines (competitive advantage via market restriction)
  • child-safety advocacy organizations (regulatory validation of their concerns)
  • CPSC (expanded enforcement authority and budget justification)

Named in the bill

Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020, toy manufacturers, child care product manufacturers, Mr. Moore of Utah (sponsor)

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.

  • Apr 20, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Apr 20, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,995 characters) on Jun 8, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress bans AI chatbots in children's toys—but without evidence of harm.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8382 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.