Public housing tenants win right to keep pets regardless of breed
H.R. 8378 — Pets Belong with Families Act · Filed by Michael Lawler (R-NY) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 20, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal public housing law to prohibit housing authorities from banning pets based on breed, size, or weight. It allows housing agencies to charge capped pet deposits (max 10% of monthly rent, spread over 3+ months and fully refundable), limit the number of animals per unit, and exclude species banned by state/local law or individual animals deemed dangerous by a court. Pet deposits cannot be withheld for non-pet damage or normal wear and tear.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a prohibition on breed-based pet restrictions in public housing, paired with financial protections (deposit caps, refund requirements) for tenants. It is a straightforward tenant-rights measure with no hidden deregulation or industry carve-out.
What the text implies
- Housing authorities may face increased administrative burden tracking pet deposits, amortization schedules, and refund timelines, potentially requiring new accounting systems or staff training.
- The prohibition on breed restrictions may increase pet-related liability exposure for housing authorities, though the bill preserves their right to exclude individual animals deemed dangerous by court order.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Tenants in public housing gain a concrete right: they can no longer be denied pet ownership based on breed, size, or weight. The bill also protects them financially by capping deposits at 10% of rent, requiring amortization over 3+ months, and mandating full refunds of unused deposits within 30 days.