Congress votes to pay for its own misconduct—or does it?
H.R. 8300 — Swalwell Act · Filed by Paul Gosar (R-AZ) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 15, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits using taxpayer money to pay settlements for workplace misconduct claims (harassment, discrimination, retaliation) involving Members of Congress or senior congressional staff. Instead, the accused official must pay out of pocket. The bill requires public disclosure of all past and future settlements in a searchable database (without naming victims), and mandates that criminal allegations be referred to the Department of Justice.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is straightforward: it shifts financial liability for misconduct settlements from taxpayers to the accused official, mandates public disclosure, and ensures criminal referrals. This is a direct accountability and transparency measure with no hidden deregulatory or subsidy mechanism.
What the text implies
- The bill may incentivize out-of-court settlements without formal legal process, since accused officials now bear full cost and may prefer to avoid public disclosure entirely—potentially reducing transparency if settlements occur outside the formal system.
- The 30-day disclosure deadline and retroactive 180-day publication window create a lag during which misconduct remains hidden from voters, potentially affecting election timing and voter knowledge.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens gain transparency about misconduct by their elected representatives and accountability through personal financial liability, which removes the perverse incentive to settle claims with public money. Victims retain privacy protection while the public gains the right to know who committed misconduct and how much it cost.