QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress creates permanent disaster recovery fund, prioritizing low-income housing

H.R. 8291 — Reforming Disaster Recovery Act · Filed by Al Green (D-TX) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 15, 2026 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Disaster Recovery Housing & Mitigation Fund

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a dedicated federal fund for long-term disaster recovery housing and community development, administered by HUD. It establishes a formula-based grant program that directs money to states, local governments, and tribes in areas most damaged by catastrophic disasters, with at least 70% of funds required to benefit low- and moderate-income households. The bill emphasizes mitigation, affordable housing restoration, and resilience planning alongside immediate recovery needs.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is establishing a dedicated, formula-allocated federal fund for post-disaster housing, infrastructure, and mitigation assistance to low-income communities. This is its primary and stated purpose, executed through amendments to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974.

What the text implies

  • The bill grants HUD Secretary broad waiver authority (Section 6, subsection (k)) to override statutory and regulatory requirements, subject only to a 5-day public notice period and a 'good cause' finding. This could allow rapid deviation from the 70% low-income benefit floor or other protections if the Secretary deems it necessary.
  • Data-sharing provisions (Section 8) authorize transfer of personally identifiable information from FEMA and SBA to HUD and then to grantees and lenders without explicit individual consent, relying on Privacy Act matching agreements. This creates privacy exposure for disaster survivors, though safeguards are nominally required.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

State and local governments (primary grantees); Indian tribes (primary grantees); Affordable housing developers and nonprofits (indirect, through grant-funded activities)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record