Transmission companies can now build power lines with just a form
H.R. 8248 — Grid Expansion and Reliability Act · Filed by Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 13, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Federal Power Act to allow companies and individuals to build or upgrade electric transmission lines in federally designated 'national interest' corridors by simply filing a self-certification form with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), rather than going through FERC's traditional permitting process. The bill requires FERC to audit these certifications annually and report to Congress on how well the streamlined process works.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to bypass FERC's formal permitting process for transmission projects in designated corridors, replacing it with self-certification. This is a deregulatory measure that prioritizes speed and developer convenience over public participation and environmental review.
What the text implies
- Self-certification removes the requirement for FERC to conduct environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) or to hold public hearings, eliminating a key avenue for community input and legal challenge.
- The bill does not specify what happens if a self-certified project causes environmental harm, violates state law, or damages private property — it only requires FERC to audit whether the certification form was complete, not whether the project itself is safe or appropriate.
- By allowing 'any person' to self-certify, the bill may enable projects by entities with no prior transmission experience or financial stability, shifting risk from developers to ratepayers and communities.
- The annual audit and reporting requirement is toothless — FERC audits only whether forms are complete, not whether projects should have been approved, and reports go to Congress (which rarely acts) rather than creating a mechanism to stop harmful projects.
- The bill's reference to 'national interest electric transmission corridors' is undefined in the provided text; if these corridors are broadly drawn or include sensitive areas, the self-certification pathway could enable projects in environmentally or culturally significant locations without traditional review.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill eliminates FERC's traditional permitting review for transmission projects in designated corridors, removing public notice, environmental review, and formal hearing opportunities that currently allow citizens and communities to challenge or shape transmission siting. While faster permitting may eventually lower electricity costs, the immediate effect is to strip ordinary people of their right to participate in decisions affecting their land, property values, and local environment.
Who stands to gain
- electric transmission developers and utilities
- renewable energy project developers (who may need transmission to connect to grid)
- construction and engineering firms specializing in transmission infrastructure
Named in the bill
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Federal Power Act, national interest electric transmission corridor, House Committee on Energy and Commerce
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Apr 13, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Apr 13, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
7 lobbying clients named this bill on 7 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $2,629,193 in lobbying spend. A filing names 66 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 86% of bills with at least one filing.
Josh Gottheimer, the sponsor, reported $1,000,800 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Edison Electric Institute — $1,689,193 on 1 filing
- Xcel Energy Inc — $370,000 on 1 filing
- Puget Sound Energy — $350,000 on 1 filing
- Portland General Electric — $90,000 on 1 filing
- Ppl Corporation — $70,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,265 characters) on Aug 13, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Transmission companies can now build power lines with just a form” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8248 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.