Congress mandates 12 days paid leave for reproductive health—with teeth
H.R. 8158 — Reproductive Healthcare Leave Act · Filed by Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ) · 28 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 30, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires employers with 5+ employees to grant each worker 96 hours (12 days) of paid leave annually, usable for reproductive health reasons—including menstruation, endometriosis, fertility treatments, pregnancy termination, and related medical procedures. Employers with existing paid-leave policies covering the same conditions are exempt. The bill prohibits retaliation, requires notice to employees, and creates enforcement mechanisms through the Department of Labor and private lawsuits.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to establish a new federal paid-leave entitlement for reproductive health absences, enforced through labor law mechanisms. It is a worker-protection statute, not a tax provision, subsidy, or commemorative measure.
What the text implies
- Employers may face increased administrative burden tracking reproductive-health leave separately from other paid time off, potentially creating privacy concerns if leave reasons are disclosed.
- The bill does not specify whether employers can require medical certification for reproductive-health leave, creating potential ambiguity in enforcement and employee privacy.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary workers gain a concrete, portable right to paid time off for reproductive health needs without fear of retaliation or penalty. The bill protects workers from discrimination and provides multiple enforcement avenues (DOL complaint, private lawsuit, attorney fees).