Congress demands public database of election vendors—finally.
H.R. 8118 — Election Infrastructure Integrity Act · Filed by Ralph Norman (R-SC) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 26, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Election Assistance Commission to create and maintain a public database listing all private vendors involved in election systems for federal elections. States and local election officials must report vendor names, contract terms (except security-sensitive details), and ownership information within 30 days of each federal election. States that fail to comply lose federal election funding.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a transparency requirement—mandating public disclosure of election vendors and their ownership. It is not a subsidy, carve-out, or deregulation; it is a disclosure-and-accountability measure.
What the text implies
- The 30-day reporting window is tight; states with limited administrative capacity may struggle to compile vendor data, potentially triggering federal funding loss despite good-faith compliance efforts.
- Vendors may resist disclosure of contract terms and ownership structures; the bill permits withholding 'security reasons' information, creating a loophole that could obscure material vendor relationships.
- Foreign ownership disclosure requirement may chill investment by foreign-owned election-tech firms, potentially reducing vendor competition and innovation in a sector where U.S. dominance is already high.
- The database is public but unvetted; no provision requires the EAC to verify vendor data, audit submissions, or enforce accuracy, risking misinformation or incomplete records.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens gain direct transparency into the private vendors operating election systems—a critical public-interest outcome in an era of election-security concerns. The compliance burden on states is administrative rather than substantive, and the funding-loss penalty creates strong incentive alignment without blocking elections.
Named in the bill
Election Assistance Commission (EAC), Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA), State election officials, Local election administrators, Private election vendors, Federal election funding
Where it stands
5 cosponsors: 5 Republicans.
- Mar 26, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Mar 26, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on House Administration · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on House Administration”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,607 characters) on Apr 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress demands public database of election vendors—finally.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8118 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.