Congress quietly hands debt-laden corporations a major tax break
H.R. 8101 — Ensuring Better Interest Treatment and Deductibility Act (EBITDA) · Filed by Ron Estes (R-KS) · 22 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 26, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill reverses a prior restriction on how much interest expense businesses can deduct from their taxes by restoring the more generous EBITDA-based formula under tax code Section 163(j). Under the older, more favorable rule, companies could deduct more interest because depreciation and amortization were added back into the income calculation — a significant advantage for debt-heavy businesses. The primary beneficiaries are large, highly leveraged corporations, private equity-backed companies, and capital-intensive industries that carry substantial debt loads.
Why we flagged it
Despite its neutral-sounding acronym branding, this bill functionally restores a more favorable EBITDA-based calculation for business interest deductibility under IRC Section 163(j), directly reducing tax burdens for highly leveraged corporations. The acronym itself is a deliberate marketing choice that obscures the bill's narrow financial beneficiary profile.
What the text implies
- Restoring EBITDA-based ATI calculation allows companies to deduct significantly more interest expense, reducing federal tax receipts without offsetting revenue measures or explicit reauthorization sunset dates.
- Highly leveraged private equity-backed companies and LBO targets become substantially more tax-advantaged, potentially incentivizing further debt-financed acquisitions and financial engineering at the expense of equity-financed business investment.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
highly leveraged corporations; private equity firms; leveraged buyout targets