QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress quietly expands tax breaks for wealthy to skip traditional insurance

H.R. 810 — Personalized Care Act of 2025 · Filed by Chip Roy (R-TX) · 12 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 28, 2025 · Referred to committee

35%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
58/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernHSA Expansion and Insurance Market…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill expands Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) by allowing people to use them for a much broader range of medical arrangements—including direct-pay doctor fees, health care sharing ministries (religious cost-sharing groups), and insurance premiums—while nearly tripling contribution limits ($10,800 individual, $29,500 family). It also reclassifies these arrangements so they are no longer treated as traditional health insurance, and lowers the tax penalty for non-medical HSA withdrawals from 20% to 10%.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to dramatically expand HSA eligibility and contribution limits while reclassifying non-traditional medical arrangements (direct-pay, faith-based cost-sharing) as HSA-eligible expenses. This is functionally a tax subsidy for high-income savers and a mechanism to route people away from regulated insurance into alternative arrangements.

What the text implies

  • By allowing HSA funds to pay for health care sharing ministries (which are explicitly exempt from insurance regulations under section 5000A), the bill creates a tax-subsidized pathway for people to opt out of regulated insurance entirely, potentially destabilizing traditional insurance pools.
  • The reclassification of direct-pay physician fees and ministry memberships as 'not health insurance' while making them HSA-eligible creates a two-tier system: wealthy individuals can use pre-tax dollars for unregulated alternatives, while lower-income workers remain in traditional plans.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

health insurance companies (UNH, HUM, UHS) via reduced enrollment in traditional plans; direct-pay primary care networks and concierge medicine providers; health care sharing ministries

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record