DHS enforcement funding expands with new detention oversight and reporting requirements.
H.R. 8029 — Pay Our Homeland Defenders Act · Filed by Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ) · Introduced Mar 20, 2026 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a fiscal year 2026 appropriations bill for the Department of Homeland Security, allocating approximately $51.4 billion across CBP, ICE, TSA, Coast Guard, Secret Service, and other DHS components. It funds border enforcement, immigration detention and removal, airport security, coast guard operations, and protective services, while imposing reporting requirements on agency leadership and restrictions on certain operational changes.
Why we flagged it
This is a routine annual appropriations bill for DHS that funds enforcement agencies (CBP, ICE, TSA, Coast Guard, Secret Service) and imposes operational restrictions and reporting requirements. It is not a deregulation, tax measure, or commemorative bill—it is a standard appropriations instrument with enforcement and oversight provisions.
What the text implies
- Section 214 allows the Secretary to reprogram funds to ICE detention operations without normal reprogramming limits, potentially enabling rapid expansion of detention capacity without congressional approval.
- Section 213 ties detention facility contracts to performance evaluations, but does not mandate closure of underperforming facilities—it only permits discontinuation, leaving discretion with DHS.
- Section 211 requires implementation of maternal health standards for pregnant women in CBP custody, but enforcement mechanism and penalties for non-compliance are not specified.
- Section 205 permits personal importation of Canadian prescription drugs but excludes controlled substances and biologics, creating a narrow carve-out that may not significantly reduce drug costs for most consumers.
- The bill appropriates $20M for body-worn cameras for immigration enforcement agents (Section 109), but does not mandate public access to footage or establish retention/disclosure standards.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill funds border enforcement and immigration detention operations that affect millions of people crossing borders or in removal proceedings, while imposing oversight and reporting requirements that increase transparency. However, it also sustains and expands detention capacity and enforcement operations that disproportionately affect immigrants and asylum seekers, and includes provisions (like the ban on border crossing fees) that may limit revenue for border infrastructure. The net effect
Who stands to gain
- detention facility contractors
- defense contractors (MQ-9 aircraft procurement)
- vehicle manufacturers (police-type vehicles)
- aircraft and marine vessel manufacturers
- security equipment vendors
Named in the bill
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Secret Service, Office of Inspector General, Public Law 119-21, Public Law 118-159, Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund
Where it stands
- Mar 20, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Mar 20, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Budget and House Committee on Appropriations · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to…”
- Mar 26, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 206 (Roll no. 104)”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,882,100 in lobbying spend. A filing names 68 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Juan Ciscomani, the sponsor, reported $1,708,777 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Association of Airport Executives — $1,172,100 on 1 filing
- Reinsurance Assn of America — $710,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 23, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (50,094 characters) on Apr 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 23, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“DHS enforcement funding expands with new detention oversight and reporting requirements.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8029 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.