QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Bill targets Sharia law in civil rights amendment, inflaming religious tensions

H.R. 8017 — Defeat Sharia Law in America Act · Filed by Barry Moore (R-AL) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 19, 2026 · Referred to committee

30%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
72/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernReligious Discrimination Clarification with…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to declare that any public accommodation (hotel, restaurant, store, etc.) that applies Sharia law in providing goods or services is committing religious discrimination under federal law. The bill does not create new enforcement mechanisms or penalties; it clarifies that Sharia-law-based service denial falls within existing civil rights prohibitions. The primary beneficiary is any person denied service on religious grounds; the bill restores their right to sue under the 1964 Act.

Why we flagged it

The operative mechanism is a straightforward amendment to civil rights law clarifying that Sharia-law-based service denial constitutes religious discrimination. However, the title 'Defeat Sharia Law in America Act' frames the amendment as an anti-Islamic measure rather than a neutral civil rights clarification, creating a significant gap between stated purpose and actual legal effect.

What the text implies

  • The bill's title suggests a broad anti-Sharia agenda, but the operative text is narrowly limited to public accommodations and service denial. The gap between title and mechanism may invite misinterpretation or future legislative expansion beyond the stated scope.
  • By naming Sharia law specifically rather than 'religious law' or 'religious practice,' the bill creates a single-religion-targeted amendment to a statute designed to be religion-neutral. This asymmetry may invite constitutional challenge on Establishment Clause grounds.
  • The amendment does not define 'Sharia law' or specify which practices trigger the discrimination finding. Ambiguity in the operative term may create litigation risk and inconsistent application across jurisdictions.
  • The bill does not address whether the amendment applies to religious organizations operating as public accommodations (e.g., a religiously affiliated hotel or restaurant), which may create tension with ministerial exception doctrine.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill clarifies that religious discrimination in public accommodations—specifically service denial based on Sharia law—is unlawful under existing civil rights law. This strengthens the legal position of individuals who would otherwise face service denial on religious grounds, providing clearer standing to challenge such discrimination.

Named in the bill

Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 201(a), public accommodations, Sharia law

Where it stands

3 cosponsors: 3 Republicans.

  • Mar 19, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Mar 19, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (447 characters) on Sep 7, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,398 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-23.

“Bill targets Sharia law in civil rights amendment, inflaming religious tensions” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8017 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.