Congress splits the tax difference: relief for workers, surcharge for millionaires
H.R. 7937 — Working Americans’ Tax Cut Act · Filed by Donald Beyer (D-VA) · 13 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 16, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates two tax changes: (1) a cap on the tax rate for low- and middle-income individuals earning up to 175% of a cost-of-living threshold (roughly $80,500 for single filers in 2026), limiting their tax to 25.5% of income above that threshold; and (2) a new surcharge on high earners, imposing 5–12% additional tax on income above $1 million. Low- and middle-income workers benefit from the rate cap; high earners pay more.
Why we flagged it
The bill combines a rate ceiling for lower earners (a tax cut) with a surcharge on high earners (a tax increase), creating a mixed progressive/regressive structure. The core mechanism is straightforward tax-code amendment, not a hidden rider or carve-out.
What the text implies
- The 25.5% rate cap for low/middle-income earners may interact unpredictably with existing credits and deductions, potentially creating cliff effects or unintended phase-outs.
- The surcharge on high earners is indexed to inflation (CPI-U) but the low-income threshold is also indexed; long-term distributional effects depend on whether wage growth outpaces inflation.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
low- and middle-income individual taxpayers; high-income earners subject to surcharge (negative benefit)