Federal law-enforcement funding held hostage over gun-free zones
H.R. 7935 — Shall Not Be Infringed Act of 2026 · Filed by John McGuire (R-VA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Mar 16, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill conditions federal law-enforcement grants (Byrne-JAG and COPS funding) on states and localities eliminating gun-free zones. It creates a private right of action allowing people harmed in gun-free zones to sue the jurisdiction for damages if they claim they could have prevented harm by carrying a firearm. States that refuse lose up to 99% of federal law-enforcement funding.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is not a direct ban or mandate, but rather a financial penalty (loss of Byrne-JAG and COPS grants) tied to gun-free-zone policy compliance. It uses federal funding leverage to force state and local policy change, combined with a new private tort liability.
What the text implies
- Creates a new private right of action with speculative causation (could have averted harm if armed), potentially opening jurisdictions to high-volume, low-threshold litigation even when gun-free zones had no causal role in the harm.
- Byrne-JAG and COPS funding are core sources for local police operations, detective units, and community policing; loss of up to 99% would cripple law-enforcement capacity in non-compliant jurisdictions, creating a perverse incentive to abandon gun-free zones regardless of local public-safety data.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
firearms manufacturers and retailers (increased carry eligibility); liability insurance companies (new tort exposure for municipalities); law firms specializing in municipal litigation