QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

States can now cap rates on their own banks—but not out-of-state lenders

H.R. 7866 — American Lending Fairness Act of 2026 · Filed by Warren Davidson (R-OH) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 9, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
State Lending Authority Carve-out

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill allows individual states to opt out of federal interest-rate preemption rules, but ONLY for loans made by banks and credit unions chartered within that state. It repeals the existing federal opt-out mechanism (Section 525 of the 1980 Deregulation Act) and replaces it with a narrower one: a state can now block federal rate caps on its own-chartered lenders, but cannot extend that block to out-of-state lenders operating within its borders. The effect is to restore state authority over in-state lending while preserving federal preemption for interstate lenders.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a repeal-and-replace of federal preemption opt-out rules, narrowing the scope to state-chartered lenders only. This is fundamentally a federalism adjustment that shifts regulatory authority from federal to state level, but only for a subset of lenders.

What the text implies

  • States that opt out will create a two-tier lending market: state-chartered lenders subject to state rate caps, out-of-state lenders subject to federal preemption. This may incentivize borrowers to seek out-of-state lenders to avoid state caps, potentially undermining state consumer protections.
  • The bill's language requires states to adopt a law or voter certification 'explicitly and by its terms' stating they do not want federal preemption to apply. This high bar may prevent states from opting out via general consumer-protection statutes, limiting practical state authority.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

out-of-state banks and credit unions (retain federal preemption in all states); federally-chartered depository institutions (unaffected by state opt-outs)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record