QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress quietly modernizes poverty benefits for first time in 37 years

H.R. 7828 — Supplemental Security Income Restoration Act of 2026 · Filed by Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) · 32 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 5, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Social Safety Net Expansion

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill substantially increases income and resource limits for Supplemental Security Income (SSI), a federal program for elderly, blind, and disabled individuals with limited income. It raises the general income exclusion from $240 to $1,892 annually, earned income exclusion from $780 to $6,149, and resource limits from $2,250 to $20,000 for individuals (and $1,500 to $10,000 for couples), with automatic inflation adjustments thereafter. The bill also eliminates the marriage penalty, removes restrictions on retirement accounts, extends SSI to U.S. territories, and simplifies rules around in-kind support and past-due benefit handling—benefiting approximately 7+ million low-income SSI recipients nationwide.

Why we flagged it

This bill directly increases income and resource limits for SSI recipients and expands program eligibility to U.S. territories. It is a straightforward social welfare enhancement with no apparent hidden agendas or narrow beneficiaries.

What the text implies

  • Significant federal budget impact from expanded eligibility and higher benefit floors not quantified in excerpt, with annual costs potentially growing unpredictably as CPI-E indexing may exceed general inflation over decades.
  • Extension to Puerto Rico, USVI, Guam, and American Samoa creates administrative complexity and potential interstate equity questions, as territorial SSI beneficiaries may face different cost-of-living realities than mainland recipients using the same poverty guideline baseline.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the bill title — full-text pass pending · 119th Congress · public record