QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Farm subsidy disguised as import relief—and your groceries may pay

H.R. 7762 — Protecting Our Produce Act · Filed by Sanford Bishop (D-GA) · Introduced Mar 3, 2026 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Agricultural Import-Relief Subsidy

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a 5-year pilot program that pays U.S. producers of certain seasonal crops (asparagus, bell peppers, blueberries, cucumbers, squash) when import competition drives domestic prices below a 5-year historical average. Eligible farmers—those with less than $5 million average annual income and deriving at least 75% of income from farming—can apply for payments calculated as the price gap multiplied by their recent production volume. The program authorizes $200 million annually and requires the Secretary of Agriculture to determine which price drops are caused by imports.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a direct payment program to domestic produce farmers triggered by import-driven price declines. While framed as 'crop loss' recovery, the payments are contingent on import causation, making this functionally a targeted subsidy protecting domestic producers from international price competition.

What the text implies

  • The bill grants the Secretary of Agriculture broad discretion to determine (1) which price declines are 'caused by imports' and (2) which geographical regions qualify, creating potential for political favoritism in program administration without clear statutory criteria.
  • By compensating farmers when imports lower prices, the program may reduce incentives for domestic producers to improve efficiency, diversify crops, or adapt to market conditions—potentially entrenching dependence on subsidy rather than market adaptation.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

domestic produce farmers (asparagus, bell pepper, blueberry, cucumber, squash producers); agricultural input suppliers (seed, fertilizer, equipment vendors serving these crops)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record