QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds women's health research push, seats pharma at the table

H.R. 7694 — Gwenn’s Law · Filed by Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 25, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Health Research Coordination

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the Department of Health and Human Services to run two public awareness campaigns—one to increase women's participation in NIH clinical trials generally, and another focused on bleeding and clotting disorders—and establishes a permanent interagency task force to coordinate federal efforts on rare disease research and treatment, with particular attention to conditions affecting women. The bill authorizes $10 million per year for five years for each campaign and requires HHS to produce an action plan within 180 days on coordinating rare-disease research that disproportionately affects women.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is establishing federal coordination mechanisms and public awareness campaigns for women's health and rare disease research—a public health infrastructure measure, not a commemorative or vanity bill despite its eponymous title.

What the text implies

  • The task force includes four appointed positions for 'biopharmaceutical innovators' with respect to rare diseases, creating a formal channel for private pharmaceutical industry input into federal research prioritization and incentive design—potentially shaping which rare diseases receive public research support.
  • The bill's focus on 'rare diseases and conditions that disproportionately impact women' may create a research-funding bias toward conditions affecting women, potentially reducing relative attention to rare diseases affecting other populations, though this reflects a deliberate policy choice rather than a hidden mechanism.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

biopharmaceutical companies developing rare disease treatments; clinical research institutions and hospitals conducting NIH-funded trials; private health plan administrators (task force members)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record