Federal research program for ocean carbon removal, with tribal consultation and public data access.
H.R. 7656 — ReSCUE Oceans Act · Filed by Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 24, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill establishes a federal research program to study and advance marine carbon dioxide removal (CDR) — technologies that capture CO2 from ocean water or the atmosphere using methods like ocean alkalinity enhancement, macroalgae cultivation, and nutrient fertilization. The program, run by NOAA in coordination with 20 federal agencies, will fund research grants, designate research areas, monitor environmental and community impacts, and develop standards and best practices. It requires meaningful consultation with Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, protects tribal data sovereignty, and mandates public access to research findings. Ordinary citizens benefit through climate research advancement, environmental safeguards, and community engagement in decisions affecting coastal areas.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is establishing a federally coordinated research program for marine carbon dioxide removal with mandatory environmental monitoring, community engagement, and tribal consultation. It is fundamentally a public research and governance framework, not a deregulation, subsidy, or private carve-out.
What the text implies
- The bill creates a 5-year renewable authorization for research areas, potentially establishing long-term federal presence in coastal and estuarine ecosystems; renewal depends on demonstrated progress and compliance, creating ongoing federal oversight.
- Tribal data sovereignty provisions (sections 101(e)(3), 102(f)(2)(B), 104(h)(3)) exempt tribal-submitted data from FOIA disclosure without consent, creating a carve-out from standard federal transparency that may limit public access to research conducted on or affecting tribal lands.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
research institutions and universities (grant recipients); marine technology developers and CDR companies (through research partnerships and commercialization; consulting firms and contractors (monitoring, data management, technical assistance)