Congress bans Chinese battery imports citing spy fears—but the threat is unproven.
H.R. 7635 — CHARGE Act · Filed by W. Steube (R-FL) · Introduced Feb 20, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits U.S. imports of energy storage systems (batteries, power storage devices) made by Chinese entities or under Chinese Communist Party control if they contain remote monitoring capabilities. The bill treats such imports as a national security threat, claiming they could allow China to spy on or sabotage the U.S. electrical grid. Violators face up to 5 years in prison and $250,000 fines per shipment; U.S. Customs and Border Protection must enforce the ban within 60 days.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is an import ban on a specific category of goods (Chinese energy storage systems with remote monitoring) justified on national security grounds. While framed as infrastructure protection, it functions as a targeted trade restriction that may protect domestic manufacturers.
What the text implies
- The definition of 'remote monitoring capability' is so broad ('capable of observing, collecting, analyzing, and disrupting data') that it could encompass standard remote diagnostics, firmware updates, and performance monitoring—features common in modern energy storage systems regardless of origin.
- The ban applies to systems 'manufactured with technology licensed or owned by' Chinese entities, which could capture U.S.-designed systems manufactured under license or using licensed components, creating unintended collateral damage to legitimate supply chains.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
U.S. energy storage manufacturers; Domestic battery and power electronics companies; American renewable energy equipment suppliers