Congress funds historic battlefield preservation and study through 2036
H.R. 7618 — American Battlefield Protection Program Amendments Act of 2026 · Filed by Jennifer Kiggans (R-VA) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 20, 2026 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill reauthorizes and modifies the American Battlefield Protection Program, a federal grant program that helps preserve historic battlefield sites. It increases cost-sharing flexibility for grant recipients, authorizes $2 million annually through 2036 for battlefield interpretation grants, and directs the National Park Service to study and document French and Indian War (1754–1763) and Mexican-American War (1846–1848) sites across the country, with options for preservation, interpretation, or potential National Park System designation.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is reauthorizing and expanding a federal grant program for battlefield preservation and interpretation, with new study requirements for specific historic periods. It is straightforward public-lands legislation with no hidden mechanisms or narrow beneficiaries.
What the text implies
- The bill allows non-governmental entities (including the American Battlefield Trust and private preservation organizations) to conduct studies and submit them for federal certification, potentially shifting study costs from federal to private budgets while maintaining federal oversight and publication.
- Designation of newly studied sites as National Park System units could trigger long-term federal management and maintenance obligations not explicitly budgeted in this bill, creating unfunded future liabilities.
- The 180-day certification timeline for third-party studies may create pressure on the National Park Service to approve studies quickly, potentially affecting quality control or thoroughness of site assessment.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill expands public access to and preservation of nationally significant historic sites at no direct cost to ordinary citizens, while increasing federal funding for battlefield protection and interpretation. The cost-sharing modifications make grants more accessible to state and local governments and nonprofits, broadening the public benefit.
Who stands to gain
- state and local governments (grant recipients)
- nonprofit historic preservation organizations
- American Battlefield Trust
- tribal governments
Named in the bill
National Park Service, Department of the Interior, American Battlefield Trust, House Committee on Natural Resources, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, state governments, tribal governments, local governments
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 4 Republicans, 2 Democrats.
- Feb 20, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 20, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources and Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
- Mar 26, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
- Apr 21, 2026 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Apr 21, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Unanimous Consent”
- Jun 2, 2026 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
- Jun 3, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required)…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $325,374 in lobbying spend. A filing names 24 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Jennifer Kiggans, the sponsor, reported $1,313,089 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Open Space Institute, Inc. — $155,000 on 1 filing
- National Parks Conservation Association — $150,724 on 1 filing
- American Battlefield Trust — $19,650 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 21, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,965 characters) on Jul 9, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 21, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
- H.R. 7618 on Congress.gov
- Actions and status history
- Cosponsors (6)
- Bill text the analysis read
- Open Space Institute, Inc. — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- National Parks Conservation Association — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- American Battlefield Trust — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Jennifer Kiggans — FEC candidate receipts, 2026 cycle
“Congress funds historic battlefield preservation and study through 2036” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7618 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.