Federal timber lands shift from conservation to harvest priority
H.R. 7603 — O&C Renewal Act of 2026 · Filed by Cliff Bentz (R-OR) · Introduced Feb 20, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the 1937 O&C Act to reestablish timber production as the primary purpose of federally managed O&C lands in Oregon, replacing a more balanced multi-use mandate. It requires the federal government to meet state-level fire protection standards on these lands, enter into fire agreements with Oregon, and directs the Interior Department to revise resource management plans within two years to designate timberlands and prioritize timber harvest under a 'sustained yield' principle.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a statutory reordering of land-use priorities on O&C lands, elevating timber production from a secondary to primary purpose while adding a fire protection requirement. This is a resource-management restructuring, not a commemorative or procedural measure.
What the text implies
- Redefining 'timberlands' by a specific board-measure threshold (300,000 feet per 40 acres) may expand the acreage eligible for harvest by excluding marginal or recovering forest stands, increasing timber supply and revenue but potentially reducing habitat and watershed protection.
- The mandate to revise resource management plans within 2 years compresses environmental review timelines, potentially limiting public comment and scientific input on how fire protection and timber production interact on specific parcels.
- Fire protection standards are pegged to Oregon state standards, not federal environmental law or best science, creating a regulatory floor that may be lower than current federal practice and subordinates federal conservation mandates to state timber-industry preferences.
- Designating timber production as the primary purpose may weaken the legal basis for restricting harvest in sensitive areas (riparian zones, old-growth stands, wildlife corridors) that currently receive secondary-use protection under multi-use mandates.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates a concrete public benefit by mandating fire protection standards matching Oregon's adjacent lands, potentially reducing catastrophic wildfire risk to communities. However, it subordinates watershed protection, water regulation, and recreational access to timber production, shifting federal land management away from multi-use conservation toward extraction-focused revenue generation for county services—a trade-off that benefits timber-dependent counties but may harm broader publi
Who stands to gain
- timber companies and forest products manufacturers
- Oregon county governments (revenue from timber sales)
- forest products supply chain (mills, processors, transporters)
Named in the bill
O&C Act (1937), 43 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., Secretary of the Interior, State of Oregon, Oregon forest protective associations, WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals — mapped as regulatory_exposure), BALL (Ball Corporation — mapped as regulatory_exposure), PKG (Packaging Corporation of America — mapped as regulatory_exposure), PAAS (Pan American Silver Corp — mapped as regulatory_exposure), AMCR (Amcor PLC — mapped as regulatory_exposure)
Where it stands
- Feb 20, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 20, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $60,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 5 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Cliff Bentz, the sponsor, reported $618,750 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Forest Resource Council — $30,000 on 1 filing
- American Forest Resource Council — $30,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 11, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,265 characters) on Aug 12, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 11, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal timber lands shift from conservation to harvest priority” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7603 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.