QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal courts gain power to seize guns in crisis—with safeguards

H.R. 7599 — Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026 · Filed by Lucy McBath (D-GA) · 113 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 17, 2026 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
12/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Safety Measure

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a federal extreme risk protection order (ERPO) system allowing family members or law enforcement to petition federal courts to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed to pose imminent risk of harm to themselves or others. Courts can issue emergency orders within 24 hours based on probable cause, followed by a full hearing within 72 hours where the petitioner must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the person poses ongoing danger. Firearms are held by U.S. Marshals and returned when the order expires or is terminated, provided the person is legally eligible to own guns again. The bill also establishes a federal grant program to help states and tribes develop their own ERPO laws and requires training for law enforcement on bias-free administration.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a civil court order to temporarily remove firearms from individuals in acute crisis, with robust due-process protections. It is designed to reduce firearm-related suicide and violence, not to restrict rights broadly or permanently. The federal framework complements state ERPOs and does not preempt them.

What the text implies

  • The bill creates a federal database of individuals subject to ERPOs, integrated into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). This expands the federal firearms-prohibition database beyond traditional criminal convictions and may have collateral consequences for employment, housing, or professional licensing depending on how states and employers access the data.
  • The 'clear and convincing evidence' standard for long-term orders is higher than the 'preponderance of the evidence' standard some states use for their own ERPOs, potentially creating a two-tier system where federal orders are harder to obtain but state orders remain easier—creating incentives for petitioners to use state courts instead.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The bill creates a due-process-protected mechanism to temporarily disarm individuals in acute crisis, with multiple safeguards: probable cause for emergency orders, clear-and-convincing-evidence standard for long-term orders, right to counsel, 14-day maximum duration for emergency orders, and mandatory return of firearms upon order expiration. Ordinary citizens gain a legal tool to intervene in suicide and violence crises; respondents retain robust procedural protections and the ability to chall

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record