Wildfire bill strips environmental review, silences tribes and public
H.R. 7578 — TORCH Act · Filed by Mike Kennedy (R-UT) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Feb 13, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
The TORCH Act streamlines federal forest management by allowing the Agriculture and Interior Departments to conduct wildfire-reduction activities—including livestock grazing, timber removal, and vegetation management around power lines—with reduced environmental review. The bill exempts these activities from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Endangered Species Act consultation, and historic preservation review, and automatically approves utility vegetation plans after 60–67 days. It also allows states, tribes, and counties to keep timber sale revenue from forest restoration work.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is systematic exemption from NEPA, ESA consultation, and historic preservation review—classic deregulation—justified by wildfire risk reduction. The wildfire framing is legitimate but masks the breadth of environmental oversight being removed.
What the text implies
- Automatic approval of utility vegetation plans after 60–67 days removes meaningful public comment and environmental review, shifting de facto control to electric utilities and federal agencies without citizen input.
- Categorical exclusion from ESA section 7 consultation means forest management can proceed even if it harms listed species or critical habitat, eliminating a key legal protection for endangered wildlife.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
electric utility companies; timber companies and forest products contractors; livestock grazing permit holders