QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress greenlights rapid Israeli defense tech integration into U.S. military systems

H.R. 7540 — United States-Israel FUTURES Act of 2026 · Filed by Ronny Jackson (R-TX) · 51 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 12, 2026 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Defense Technology Partnership & Industrial…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill establishes a formal U.S.-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative under the Department of Defense to jointly develop and integrate Israeli-origin defense technologies into U.S. military systems. It authorizes $150 million annually (2027–2029) for collaborative research, development, and co-production partnerships across 10 technology domains—including counter-drone systems, missile defense, AI, cyber defense, and biotechnology—and requires the SecDef to report progress to Congress and publish unclassified updates on a public DoD website.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is establishing a formal bilateral defense R&D and co-production initiative. While framed as national security cooperation, the operative provisions explicitly authorize private-sector partnerships, licensing, and manufacturing agreements—making it functionally a defense industrial cooperation framework, not purely a government-to-government security arrangement.

What the text implies

  • The bill authorizes rapid integration of Israeli-origin technologies into U.S. military systems without explicit statutory safeguards for export control review, technology transfer restrictions, or domestic content requirements—potentially accelerating the flow of foreign-developed systems into classified U.S. programs.
  • Section 3(4) establishes 'US-based co-production or manufacturing partnerships with Israeli industry' without defining ownership, IP rights, or profit-sharing terms—creating potential for Israeli firms to capture manufacturing revenue and IP licensing fees from U.S. defense procurement.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. defense contractors (Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Northrop Grumman, etc.); Israeli defense firms (Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, Elbit Systems, IAI, etc.); U.S. academic institutions (research partnerships)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record