Travel industry gets formal seat at trade negotiations—without public guardrails
H.R. 7454 — USMCA Travel and Tourism Resiliency Act · Filed by Dina Titus (D-NV) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 9, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the U.S. Trade Representative to push for creation of a Travel and Tourism Trade Working Group during the next joint review under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The working group would bring together officials from seven U.S. agencies (Commerce, State, Homeland Security, Interior, Labor, Transportation, and USTR) plus Canadian and Mexican counterparts to discuss how to boost travel and tourism competitiveness, increase exports, and create jobs across North America. The group would consult with industry advisors and report back to Congress annually.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a procedural mandate to establish a formal working group under an existing trade agreement. It does not create new law, impose restrictions, or allocate funds—it directs the executive branch to prioritize a specific negotiating objective (a travel-tourism working group) during the next USMCA joint review.
What the text implies
- The bill gives the travel and tourism industry (hotels, airlines, tour operators, hospitality) a formal seat at the USMCA negotiating table, potentially allowing them to shape cross-border travel policy, visa procedures, and labor standards in ways that may not align with broader public interests (e.g., labor protections, environmental standards, or consumer safety).
- By requiring the working group to 'seek input and advice' from the U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board, the bill institutionalizes industry capture of trade negotiations—industry representatives will have regular, structured access to trade policy discussions that ordinary citizens and workers do not.
- The bill does not specify what outcomes the working group should pursue or what constraints should apply (e.g., labor rights, environmental protection, consumer privacy). The working group's mandate is purely to 'enhance competitiveness' and 'increase exports,' with no mention of public-interest guardrails.
- Congressional briefings are required, but the bill does not mandate public disclosure of working group discussions, proposals, or agreements—transparency is limited to Congress, not the public.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates a formal mechanism for the travel and tourism industry to influence trade policy and coordinate across government agencies, which may yield benefits like easier cross-border travel, job growth, and export competitiveness. However, the bill is fundamentally a procedural directive to negotiate and consult—it does not itself change any law, remove barriers, or guarantee any concrete benefit to ordinary travelers or workers; outcomes depend entirely on what the working group negotia
Who stands to gain
- travel and tourism industry (hotels, airlines, tour operators, hospitality services)
- international tourism operators and travel service providers
Named in the bill
United States Trade Representative (USTR), Department of Commerce, Department of State, Department of Homeland Security, Department of the Interior, Department of Labor, Department of Transportation, U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board, USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement), Canada, Mexico, U.S. Travel Association
Where it stands
4 cosponsors: 2 Democrats, 2 Republicans.
- Feb 9, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 9, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
4 lobbying clients named this bill on 5 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $3,770,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 43 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 72% of bills with at least one filing.
Dina Titus, the sponsor, reported $775,196 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $1,000 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.
- Jpmorgan Chase Holdings LLC — $1,190,000 on 1 filing
- National Rifle Association of America — $990,000 on 2 filings
- U.S. Travel Association — $800,000 on 1 filing
- National Restaurant Association — $790,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (5,447 characters) on May 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Travel industry gets formal seat at trade negotiations—without public guardrails” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7454 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.