Congress orders mineral inventory of protected federal lands
H.R. 745 — Abundant American Resources Act of 2025 · Filed by Jodey Arrington (R-TX) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 28, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs three federal agencies—the Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service, and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management—to conduct studies within three years to calculate the dollar value of minerals (oil, gas, and metals) present on federal lands and waters that are currently protected, withdrawn from mining, or under moratorium. The studies will cover national monuments designated after 1999, areas withdrawn from mining, and marine protected areas, but will exclude older national monuments and national parks. The agencies may hire private contractors to complete the work.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward directive to conduct studies quantifying mineral assets on protected federal lands. It is not itself a deregulation or extraction authorization, but rather an information-gathering exercise whose downstream policy implications are unclear from the text alone.
What the text implies
- Studies target only protected/withdrawn areas, not all federal lands, suggesting intent to build a case for opening these specific areas to extraction.
- Three-year timeline aligns with potential legislative windows for opening protected areas; data may be weaponized in future deregulation efforts.
- Private contractors hired to conduct studies may have financial interest in mineral extraction, creating potential bias in valuation methodology.
- Exclusion of pre-2000 national monuments and national parks from study scope suggests political targeting of more recent conservation designations.
- Detailed mineral inventories could enable more efficient future extraction if protected-area policies are reversed, lowering extraction costs for industry.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill itself is a study mandate with no immediate extraction or policy change—it creates information only. However, the studies target specifically protected lands and withdrawn areas, suggesting the information may be used to justify future opening of these areas to mining, which would harm environmental protections and public lands. Conversely, detailed mineral inventories could inform better conservation decisions or more efficient future extraction if it occurs. The civic cost depends ent
Who stands to gain
- mining and extraction companies (future beneficiaries if studies inform policy opening protected are
- private contractors hired to conduct studies
- oil and gas producers (if offshore moratorium areas are opened)
Named in the bill
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), United States Forest Service, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), National Park System, National monuments, Marine national monuments, Areas of critical environmental concern (ACEC)
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 6 Republicans.
- Jan 28, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 28, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,569 characters) on Sep 7, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,398 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-23.
“Congress orders mineral inventory of protected federal lands” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr745 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.