Congress eliminates climate transportation funding, pivots to bridge deck area
H.R. 7442 — National Bridge Funding Reform Act · Filed by Troy Nehls (R-TX) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 9, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill eliminates two federal transportation programs—the Carbon Reduction Program and the PROTECT (Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-Saving Transportation) Program—and redirects their funding to a new National Bridge Program. The new program distributes money to states based primarily on the total deck area of bridges (75%) and the deck area of bridges in poor condition (25%), rather than the criteria used by the eliminated programs.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is the elimination of two climate- and resilience-focused transportation programs and the redirection of their funding to a narrower bridge-replacement program. While framed as 'reform,' the bill substantively shifts federal transportation priorities away from climate adaptation and emissions reduction toward traditional bridge infrastructure, measured by deck area rather by resilience or environmental criteria.
What the text implies
- States that had leveraged Carbon Reduction Program funds for transit electrification, EV charging, or emissions-reduction projects lose that dedicated stream; bridge funding cannot be repurposed for those uses.
- PROTECT Program's focus on climate-resilient infrastructure (flood mitigation, sea-level-rise adaptation) is eliminated; states vulnerable to climate impacts lose federal support for adaptation projects.
- The deck-area formula may disadvantage states with smaller bridge inventories but higher concentrations of structurally deficient bridges; the 75/25 split favors total inventory size over condition severity.
- Federal climate and resilience transportation policy is narrowed; no successor program is created to replace the eliminated programs' climate-mitigation or adaptation functions.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens lose access to federal funding streams explicitly designed for climate adaptation, emissions reduction, and transportation resilience—programs addressing public goods like flood mitigation and carbon reduction. The new bridge-deck-area formula is geographically neutral but narrows the scope of eligible projects, potentially disadvantaging states that had prioritized climate-resilient infrastructure or emissions-reduction transportation initiatives under the eliminated programs.
Who stands to gain
- States with large bridge inventories (particularly in the Midwest and Northeast)
- Bridge construction and repair contractors
- Engineering and inspection firms specializing in bridge work
Named in the bill
U.S. Department of Transportation (Secretary), States (apportionment recipients), National Bridge Inventory, Federal-aid highways, Carbon Reduction Program (eliminated), PROTECT Program (eliminated), Title 23, United States Code
Where it stands
5 cosponsors: 5 Republicans.
- Feb 9, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 9, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $20,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 2 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Troy Nehls, the sponsor, reported $202,300 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- National Federation of Filipino Associations — $20,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 18, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,833 characters) on May 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 18, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress eliminates climate transportation funding, pivots to bridge deck area” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7442 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.