Congress redirects highway funds to local bridge repair, bypassing states
H.R. 7437 — BASICS Act · Filed by Kristen McDonald Rivet (D-MI) · 13 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 9, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
The BASICS Act restructures federal transportation funding to prioritize bridge repair and safety improvements, creating a new $5.5 billion annual bridge-strengthening program (2027–2031) and a $150 million annual regional transportation planning program. It reallocates existing highway funding formulas, requires states to consult local governments on project selection, eliminates the local match requirement for metropolitan planning, and allows metropolitan planning organizations to become direct recipients of federal funds, bypassing state intermediaries.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is restructuring existing federal transportation appropriations to create new dedicated programs for bridge repair and regional planning, rather than authorizing new spending or creating new agencies. It is fundamentally a reallocation and governance reform.
What the text implies
- Direct recipient status for metropolitan planning organizations may reduce state-level coordination and oversight of regional transportation priorities, potentially fragmenting planning across metro areas.
- The 25% population-based suballocation mandate in bridge and safety programs may disadvantage rural states with dispersed populations, concentrating resources in high-density urban corridors.
- Minimum $45M per-state bridge funding floor and $300K per regional planning organization may create inefficiencies if actual need is lower, locking in spending regardless of project merit.
- Elimination of local cost-share for metropolitan planning (100% federal) may reduce local accountability for planning quality and project selection discipline.
- The bill's reliance on 2021–2024 average unit costs for bridge replacement may not reflect current inflation or supply-chain realities, potentially underfunding actual repair needs.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens gain improved bridge safety and repair through dedicated funding, stronger local voice in project selection via mandatory consultation, and faster project delivery through streamlined planning. The elimination of local cost-sharing for planning and direct federal funding to metropolitan areas reduces barriers to infrastructure investment in underserved regions.
Who stands to gain
- construction and engineering firms (bridge repair/replacement contractors)
- metropolitan planning organizations (direct federal funding recipients)
- regional transportation planning organizations (new dedicated funding stream)
- state departments of transportation (administrative roles preserved)
Named in the bill
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT/Secretary), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), Regional Transportation Planning Organizations, State Departments of Transportation, Local governments, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), Title 23 USC (Federal-Aid Highway Program)
Where it stands
13 cosponsors: 7 Republicans, 6 Democrats.
- Feb 9, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 9, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
20 lobbying clients named this bill on 20 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $991,872 in lobbying spend. A filing names 4 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 97% of bills with at least one filing.
Kristen McDonald Rivet, the sponsor, reported $1,610,092 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Society of Civil Engineers — $303,370 on 1 filing
- Associated General Contractors of America — $216,377 on 1 filing
- National Asphalt Pavement Association — $150,000 on 1 filing
- State of Nevada — $60,000 on 1 filing
- County of Santa Barbara — $24,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 23, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (17,223 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 23, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
- H.R. 7437 on Congress.gov
- Actions and status history
- Cosponsors (13)
- Bill text the analysis read
- American Society of Civil Engineers — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Associated General Contractors of America — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- National Asphalt Pavement Association — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Kristen McDonald Rivet — FEC candidate receipts, 2026 cycle
“Congress redirects highway funds to local bridge repair, bypassing states” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7437 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.