QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds K–12 math and data science education to close STEM skills gap

H.R. 730 — Mathematical and Statistical Modeling Education Act · Filed by Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 24, 2025 · Passed chamber

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
STEM Education Research Funding

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill authorizes $10 million per year (2026–2030) for the National Science Foundation to fund research and development projects at universities and nonprofits aimed at improving how K–12 schools teach mathematical modeling, statistical analysis, and data science. It also funds a $1 million per year study by the National Academies to identify barriers and best practices in teaching these skills. The bill targets underrepresented groups in STEM and emphasizes partnerships between schools, employers, and researchers to make math and statistics education more practical and career-relevant.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a straightforward authorization of federal research grants to improve K–12 mathematical and statistical modeling education. It funds competitive awards to universities and nonprofits, plus a study by the National Academies. No deregulation, no tax carve-outs, no immunity grants—just appropriations for education research.

What the text implies

  • The bill's emphasis on 'computational tools' and 'data science' may indirectly benefit EdTech companies and software vendors if schools adopt their platforms as part of funded projects, though no specific vendor is named or favored.
  • The requirement that educators partner with 'industry' and 'employers' to contextualize math/stats teaching could create pathways for corporate influence over curriculum design, depending on implementation.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

universities and nonprofit organizations receiving NSF grants; K–12 schools and local educational agencies (indirect, through professional development and curricul; potentially EdTech and software companies if schools adopt their tools in funded projects

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record