Congress tries to force itself to budget like a real government
H.R. 7295 — Comprehensive Congressional Budget Act of 2026 · Filed by Blake Moore (R-UT) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 30, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill restructures Congress's annual budget process to require a single comprehensive budget act each year that includes all federal spending and revenue decisions in one place, rather than scattered across multiple appropriations and authorization bills. It creates new deadlines (April 15 for budget resolution, June 10 for House committee action, June 30 for House passage) and requires all congressional committees with spending or revenue authority to submit line-item proposals to be compiled into one annual budget bill, giving members more opportunity to debate priorities and potentially control deficits.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is procedural: it restructures how Congress assembles and considers its annual budget by consolidating multiple bills into one comprehensive act and establishing new deadlines. It does not create new spending, revenue, or policy outcomes—only the mechanism by which Congress deliberates them.
What the text implies
- Tight June 30 deadline for House passage may force committees to submit baseline projections rather than substantive reforms, reducing actual policy change and shifting power toward Budget Committee staff who compile the final bill.
- Requirement that all committees submit line items may overwhelm the Budget Committee and create bottlenecks, potentially leading to more use of baseline defaults and less meaningful amendment consideration.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill could improve congressional accountability and deficit control by forcing comprehensive budget review and broader member participation, but it also imposes tight deadlines that may reduce substantive debate and amendment opportunities, and it does not address the underlying fiscal pressures (entitlement growth, revenue shortfalls) that drive deficits.