Congress narrows immunity shield for ICE and CBP officers in civil rights suits
H.R. 7284 — ICE OUT Act · Filed by Dan Goldman (D-NY) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 30, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill narrows qualified immunity protections for ICE and CBP officers in lawsuits. It eliminates immunity entirely for excessive force claims under the Fourth Amendment, and for all other claims it requires courts to first ask whether the officer's conduct violated constitutional rights before asking whether those rights were 'clearly established' at the time—reversing the current legal order and making it easier for citizens to sue and win.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is narrowing qualified immunity for ICE/CBP officers in civil rights suits. It does not create new substantive rights or establish new agency powers; it removes a procedural defense that shields officers from liability for constitutional violations.
What the text implies
- Increases litigation risk and potential liability exposure for ICE and CBP, which may affect agency budgets if damage awards or settlement costs rise significantly.
- The reordering of the immunity test (constitutional violation first, then clearly established law) may increase motion-to-dismiss denials and allow more cases to proceed to discovery and trial, raising litigation costs for the government.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
civil rights attorneys and plaintiff's bar (increased litigation and fee-shifting opportunities unde