Congress quietly subsidizes cotton industry with $billions in tax credits
H.R. 7230 — Buying American Cotton Act of 2026 · Filed by Gregory Murphy (R-NC) · 101 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 22, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal tax credit for companies that sell products made from U.S.-grown cotton. The credit is worth 24% of the cotton's market price if the cotton is processed only in the U.S. or in countries with which the U.S. has free trade agreements, or 18% if processed elsewhere. The credit can be doubled or increased 6.5-fold if the company uses U.S.-made cotton yarn or fabric, and requires digital tracking of cotton through the supply chain to prevent double-claiming.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a tax credit—a direct reduction in federal revenue—flowing to companies that sell cotton products. Despite the 'Buying American' framing, the credit is a subsidy to textile and apparel manufacturers, not a consumer benefit or public investment.
What the text implies
- The 1.6x and 6.5x multipliers for yarn and fabric create incentives for vertical integration and domestic processing, potentially raising consumer prices for cotton goods by shifting supply-chain economics.
- The digital tracing requirement and permanent bale identification system impose compliance costs on farmers and ginners, which may be passed to consumers or reduce farmer margins.
- The credit is transferable under Section 6418, allowing companies to sell unused credits to other taxpayers, creating a secondary market that benefits financial intermediaries and large corporations with tax-planning capacity.
- The bill's definition of 'free trade agreement' excludes the WTO and multilateral agreements, effectively privileging bilateral partners and creating trade-policy leverage for the administration.
- The credit applies to 'eligible articles' in 'final condition' ready for retail sale, meaning retailers and brand-name companies capture the benefit, not farmers or raw-material producers.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
This bill is a targeted tax subsidy for cotton-industry companies and textile manufacturers, funded by general tax revenue. Ordinary citizens bear the cost through foregone federal revenue while the primary beneficiaries are corporations in the cotton and apparel sectors. The bill does not lower consumer prices, expand public services, or create broad public benefit—it is a direct wealth transfer to a narrow industry.
Who stands to gain
- cotton textile manufacturers
- apparel companies
- yarn and fabric producers
- cotton ginners and processors
- tax credit trading intermediaries
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Code, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Agriculture, Agricultural Act of 2014, Trade Act of 1974, African Growth and Opportunity Act, Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act, Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015, WTO, Uruguay Round Agreements Act
Where it stands
101 cosponsors: 65 Republicans, 36 Democrats.
- Jan 22, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 22, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
7 lobbying clients named this bill on 8 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,110,409 in lobbying spend. A filing names 8 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 86% of bills with at least one filing.
Gregory Murphy, the sponsor, reported $1,068,698 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $1,000 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.
- American Farm Bureau Fed — $470,409 on 2 filings
- Target Corporation — $330,000 on 1 filing
- Gap Inc. — $180,000 on 1 filing
- Ralph Lauren Corporation — $60,000 on 1 filing
- Alabama Farmers Federation — $40,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (10,627 characters) on Aug 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress quietly subsidizes cotton industry with $billions in tax credits” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7230 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.