Congress declares life begins at fertilization, setting stage for abortion restrictions
H.R. 722 — Life at Conception Act · Filed by Eric Burlison (R-MO) · 116 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 24, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill declares that the constitutional right to life applies to all human beings from the moment of fertilization onward, and directs Congress to enforce this declaration under the 14th Amendment's equal-protection clause. It explicitly exempts women from prosecution for the death of an unborn child. The bill does not itself ban abortion or create new criminal penalties; it asserts a constitutional principle and leaves enforcement to future legislation or court action.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a declarative statement asserting a constitutional principle (right to life from fertilization) and invoking Congress's enforcement power under the 14th Amendment. It is not a direct ban, criminal statute, or appropriation, but rather a foundational assertion intended to support future legislative or judicial action.
What the text implies
- The bill's definition of 'human being' from 'moment of fertilization' could affect not only abortion law but also IVF regulation, emergency contraception classification, and miscarriage investigation protocols if enforced.
- Invoking Section 5 of the 14th Amendment positions Congress to override state abortion laws in either direction—the bill does not specify whether it preempts state restrictions or mandates them.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill creates a constitutional framework that could restrict abortion access and reproductive autonomy for pregnant people, a significant cost to those seeking abortion services. However, it explicitly shields women from criminal prosecution, and the actual enforcement mechanism and scope remain undefined—the bill itself imposes no direct ban or penalty.