Congress must now fund veteran care before authorizing war.
H.R. 7174 — Full Cost of War Act · Filed by Chris Deluzio (D-PA) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 21, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires that any future authorization for military force or declaration of war must include a separate budget authorization for the Department of Veterans Affairs to cover veterans' medical care, disability compensation, and other earned benefits resulting from that military action. The bill forces Congress to explicitly account for and fund the long-term veteran costs of war at the time it authorizes military action, rather than treating those costs as a separate, often-delayed appropriation.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is procedural and fiscal: it restructures the authorization process to force explicit budgeting for veteran costs. It is not a spending bill itself, but a requirement that spending be authorized transparently and upfront.
What the text implies
- May increase political friction around military authorizations by making the full cost (including long-term veteran care) visible and debatable at the moment of authorization, rather than deferring that debate.
- Could shift appropriations dynamics: if VA funding must be included in the AUMF, Congress cannot later claim insufficient funds for veteran care as a separate budget issue — the obligation is locked in.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens and veterans benefit from forced transparency: Congress must confront and fund the full cost of military action upfront, reducing the likelihood of underfunded veteran care and making the true fiscal and human cost of war visible at the moment of authorization. This strengthens democratic accountability by preventing the hidden deferral of veteran obligations.