Bill quietly removes endangered species from wildlife trafficking ban
H.R. 7159 — Protecting Local Zoos Act of 2026 · Filed by Paul Gosar (R-AZ) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 20, 2026 · Hearing held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Lacey Act to create exemptions from wildlife trafficking prohibitions for zoos and licensed animal facilities. It allows Class B licensed facilities (zoos, sanctuaries) to possess, register, and manage prohibited wildlife species without breeding or public contact, and permits them to export/import such animals to foreign facilities. It also lets entities that mistakenly registered prohibited animals cancel that registration if they qualify for an exemption.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is not conservation or public education—those are the stated justification. The actual function is to carve out exemptions from Lacey Act prohibitions on possessing and trading endangered wildlife, creating a legal pathway for facilities to hold and move prohibited species. The title frames this as protecting zoos, but the mechanism is exemption-creation.
What the text implies
- The 'registration cancellation' mechanism (paragraph 4) allows entities that registered prohibited animals to later claim they qualified for an exemption all along, potentially enabling retroactive legalization of animals acquired illegally or in violation of prior law.
- Export/import permission to 'foreign entities authorized to operate' in their country creates a loophole: foreign countries with weaker wildlife enforcement could become conduits for trafficking, with U.S. zoos as the legal source.
- Removal of snow leopard and clouded leopard from the prohibited species list (section 2(h)(2)) directly weakens protections for two critically endangered species, contrary to stated conservation intent.
- The bill expands who counts as a 'person' responsible for compliance to include volunteers and veterinary assistants, but does not clarify enforcement mechanisms or liability if these individuals violate breeding/contact restrictions.
- No sunset clause, audit requirement, or performance metric for the exemption—once granted, facilities have indefinite authority to hold prohibited species with minimal ongoing oversight.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates a legitimate regulatory pathway for zoos to manage endangered species in captivity for conservation and education, which serves public interest in species preservation and public access to wildlife. However, it also creates exemptions and loopholes (registration cancellation, export/import to foreign entities) that could enable trafficking or circumvention of wildlife protections if enforcement is weak or facilities misuse the exemptions.
Who stands to gain
- zoos and animal sanctuaries (Class B licensed facilities)
- exotic animal dealers and breeders (via export/import pathway)
- facilities specializing in endangered species management
Named in the bill
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Agriculture, Lacey Act Amendments of 1981, snow leopard (Uncia uncia), clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa), Class B license holders
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 1 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Jan 20, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 20, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
- Feb 4, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $80,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 9 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Paul Gosar, the sponsor, reported $87,570 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Animal Welfare Institute Fka Society for Animal Protective Legislation — $40,000 on 1 filing
- International Fund for Animal Welfare — $30,000 on 1 filing
- Feline Conservation Federation — $10,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 22, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,354 characters) on Sep 23, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,784 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 22, 2026 · page rendered 2026-09-24.
- H.R. 7159 on Congress.gov
- Actions and status history
- Cosponsors (2)
- Bill text the analysis read
- Animal Welfare Institute Fka Society for Animal Protective Legislation — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- International Fund for Animal Welfare — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Feline Conservation Federation — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Paul Gosar — FEC candidate receipts, 2026 cycle
“Bill quietly removes endangered species from wildlife trafficking ban” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7159 Report an error