Congress moves to ban federal diversity programs under anti-discrimination banner
H.R. 711 — FAIR Act of 2025 · Filed by Thomas Tiffany (R-WI) · 9 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 23, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits the federal government, federal contractors, and recipients of federal financial assistance from intentionally discriminating against or granting preferences to any person or group based on race, color, or national origin. It requires federal agencies to review and modify existing policies and regulations within 6 months to comply, and creates a private right of action allowing individuals to sue for violations and recover attorney's fees. The bill does not affect immigration law, pending cases, or existing contracts.
Why we flagged it
The bill's stated and operative mechanism are aligned: it prohibits race-based discrimination and preferential treatment in federal programs and creates enforcement mechanisms. However, the definition of 'preference' as including 'numerical goals' and 'timetables' signals an intent to restrict affirmative action and diversity programs, making the bill functionally a constraint on race-conscious remedial policies, not merely a ban on invidious discrimination.
What the text implies
- The definition of 'preference' as including 'numerical goals' and 'timetables' may invalidate or chill federal diversity initiatives, targeted recruitment programs, and race-conscious contracting set-asides that agencies currently operate under existing law and court precedent.
- The 6-month agency review and modification requirement creates pressure on federal departments to eliminate or substantially narrow race-conscious policies, potentially affecting hiring, procurement, and grant-making across the federal government.
- The private right of action with attorney's fees creates incentive for litigation challenging federal diversity programs, potentially generating case law that narrows the scope of permissible race-conscious remedies.
- The bill's non-retroactivity (pending cases and contracts unaffected) limits immediate disruption but does not prevent prospective elimination of existing programs, creating a phase-out effect.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill's core prohibition on intentional discrimination and preferential treatment in federal programs and contracting is a potential public benefit by reinforcing equal protection principles. However, the bill's definition of 'preference' as 'any advantage of any kind, including numerical goals or timetables' may functionally restrict or eliminate race-conscious remedial programs (affirmative action, diversity initiatives, targeted outreach) that courts have previously upheld as constitutiona
Named in the bill
Federal Government (executive and legislative branches), Federal contractors and subcontractors, Recipients of federal financial assistance, State entities receiving federal aid, Educational institutions, Attorney General, House Committee on the Judiciary, Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Where it stands
9 cosponsors: 9 Republicans.
- Jan 23, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 23, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on House Administration and House Committee on Education and Workforce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $60,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 3 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Thomas Tiffany, the sponsor, reported $63,525 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- The Aleut Corporation — $40,000 on 2 filings
- Katmai Government Services LLC — $20,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 12, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,248 characters) on Aug 11, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 12, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to ban federal diversity programs under anti-discrimination banner” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr711 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.