Congress moves to strip police immunity from civil rights lawsuits
H.R. 7046 — Qualified Immunity Abolition Act of 2026 · Filed by Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) · 14 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 13, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill removes qualified immunity—a legal defense that shields law enforcement officers from civil lawsuits—for any officer sued under federal civil-rights law (42 U.S.C. § 1983). Officers can no longer claim they acted in good faith, believed their conduct was lawful, or that the law was unclear as a defense. The change applies to all pending and future lawsuits against federal, state, and local police.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is straightforward: it eliminates a judicial doctrine (qualified immunity) that has shielded law enforcement from civil liability for constitutional violations. This is a direct accountability measure, not a tax, subsidy, or regulatory carve-out.
What the text implies
- Officers may face increased personal liability insurance costs or may be unable to obtain coverage, potentially affecting recruitment and retention in law enforcement.
- State and local governments may face increased indemnification obligations if they choose to cover officers' legal costs and damages, shifting costs to municipal budgets.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
civil rights attorneys and plaintiff's bar; liability insurance providers (increased premiums and policy volume)