Congress bars federal spending on Venezuelan oil—a spending constraint, not a subsidy.
H.R. 7038 — Protecting Taxpayers from Risky Investments in Venezuela Act · Filed by Mike Levin (D-CA) · 22 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 13, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits the U.S. Government from spending any federal money to finance, insure, guarantee, or otherwise support Venezuela's oil and petroleum infrastructure—including construction, equipment, insurance, loan guarantees, tax breaks, payments to companies, or diplomatic advocacy on behalf of Venezuelan oil. The State Department must report annually on compliance. Congress can override the ban only by passing a new law explicitly authorizing such spending.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward prohibition on federal spending for a specific foreign sector. It is a spending constraint, not a subsidy, carve-out, or deregulation—a routine foreign-policy spending control.
What the text implies
- The exception clause ('explicitly authorized by an Act of Congress') preserves executive flexibility if Congress later votes to override the ban, but requires a new public vote rather than allowing administrative waiver—this increases transparency but may slow emergency response.
- The bill does not restrict private U.S. companies from investing in Venezuelan oil; it only bars federal government spending and support. Private capital flows remain unaffected.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill restricts government spending on a foreign adversary's strategic resource sector, preventing taxpayer money from subsidizing or supporting Venezuelan oil infrastructure. This protects U.S.