Congress proposes federal insurance plan to compete with private insurers
H.R. 7023 — Affordable CHOICE Act · Filed by Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 12, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal public health insurance option that would be offered through the Affordable Care Act's insurance marketplaces starting in 2027. The plan would offer bronze, silver, and gold coverage tiers, set premiums to cover its own costs, negotiate provider payment rates (defaulting to Medicare rates if negotiations fail), and be administered by the federal government without transferring insurance risk to private contractors. It aims to provide affordable coverage and increase competition in the insurance market.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is the establishment and operation of a federal public health insurance plan competing in the ACA marketplace. This is a direct government entry into the insurance market, not a regulatory carve-out or subsidy to private actors.
What the text implies
- Provider participation is largely automatic for Medicare/Medicaid providers unless they opt out, potentially creating sudden enrollment surges and network adequacy challenges if providers do not participate.
- The bill defaults to Medicare fee-for-service rates if negotiation fails, which may be below private-plan rates and could reduce provider willingness to participate, especially in rural or underserved areas.
- State Advisory Councils are advisory only; the Secretary may apply or ignore their recommendations, creating potential for federal-state friction and inconsistent policy across states.
- The 10-year amortization of start-up costs assumes sustained enrollment and premium revenue; if enrollment is lower than projected, the public option may require ongoing appropriations or premium increases.
- The bill does not explicitly address how the public option interacts with employer-sponsored insurance or whether employers can offer it to employees, leaving a significant design gap.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens gain a new insurance choice with competitive pressure on pricing and a backstop option if private plans are unaffordable. The public option is required to be self-financing and comply with the same consumer protections as private plans, reducing moral hazard. However, the bill's success depends on actual enrollment, provider participation, and whether negotiated rates prove sustainable—implementation risk is real but does not negate the structural benefit of expanded choice and
Who stands to gain
- uninsured and underinsured individuals (lower-cost coverage option)
- health care providers accepting Medicare rates (guaranteed payment source)
Named in the bill
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS/Secretary), ACA Exchanges, Medicare program (title XVIII, Social Security Act), Medicaid program (title XIX, Social Security Act), State Advisory Councils, Health care providers, Health insurance issuers (private competitors)
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 6 Democrats.
- Jan 12, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 12, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
4 lobbying clients named this bill on 6 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $7,291,377 in lobbying spend. A filing names 78 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 72% of bills with at least one filing.
Jan Schakowsky, the sponsor, reported $88,051 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Medical Association — $5,643,000 on 2 filings
- Enbridge (u.s.) Inc — $732,000 on 2 filings
- Associated Builders and Contractors Inc — $700,000 on 1 filing
- Associated General Contractors of America — $216,377 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 23, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (9,381 characters) on Aug 17, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 23, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress proposes federal insurance plan to compete with private insurers” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7023 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.