QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Bill bars presidential business dealings but secretly grants tort immunity

H.R. 6831 — Stop Padding Presidential Pockets Act · Filed by Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 17, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
45/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
1
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
High concernPresidential Conflict-of-Interest &…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the President and other Secret Service-protected officials to reimburse the Treasury for the costs of Secret Service protection and other government expenses when they travel for personal business interests or financial benefit. It also bars the President from operating a business while in office, prohibits solicitation of donations for presidential libraries while in office, and creates reporting requirements and penalties for violations.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is to prevent the President from using office for personal financial gain and to require reimbursement for costs of protecting him during private business travel. However, it simultaneously grants broad tort immunity to sitting Presidents, creating a tension between accountability and protection.

  • Section 3 adds blanket tort immunity for President, Vice President, and individuals who become President/VP while claim pending—unrelated to travel reimbursement or conflict-of-interest provisions.

What the text implies

  • The Federal Tort Claims Act amendment (Section 3) creates sweeping immunity for sitting Presidents from civil liability for any wrongful act, regardless of when the act occurred—this potentially shields a President from accountability for personal misconduct unrelated to the bill's stated purpose.
  • The 100% tax on business income earned by a President while in office (Section 5) is mathematically punitive but may be difficult to enforce and could incentivize Presidents to divest or place assets in trusts, creating compliance and valuation disputes.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. Treasury (reimbursement for Secret Service and travel costs)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record