Coal miners win faster benefits, higher pay—operators face stricter liability
H.R. 6756 — Black Lung Benefits Improvement Act of 2025 · Filed by Morgan McGarvey (D-KY) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 16, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill overhauls the Black Lung Benefits Act to speed up claims processing, strengthen medical evidence standards, and increase benefit payments for coal miners with pneumoconiosis and their families. It requires independent medical evaluations, disqualifies conflicted physicians and dishonest attorneys, allows denied claimants to refile if their original denial relied on discredited expert opinions, funds attorney fees and medical expenses for contested claims, raises benefit rates indexed to inflation, and tightens financial security requirements for coal operators.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is expanding and accelerating benefits for coal miners with occupational lung disease, funded by stricter operator liability and fund management. It is fundamentally a worker-protection statute, not a deregulation or corporate carve-out.
What the text implies
- Coal operators face higher financial security requirements and personal liability for company officers (CEO, COO, treasurer), potentially increasing insurance costs and capital requirements for the industry.
- The bill allows previously denied claimants to refile without consideration of discredited chest X-ray interpretations, creating a one-time wave of new claims and fund payouts that may strain the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund in the short term.
- Disclosure of tax return and Social Security earnings data to the Department of Labor for black lung claims may set a precedent for cross-agency data sharing in other benefit programs.
- The establishment of an Office of Workers' Compensation Programs as a standalone entity (elevated from bureau status) signals potential expansion of federal workers' compensation authority beyond black lung to other occupational injury programs.
- Benefit rates are now indexed to Consumer Price Index rather than federal employee pay grades, decoupling them from wage growth and potentially reducing real benefit value over time if inflation lags wage growth.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Coal miners and their families gain faster claims processing, higher benefit payments, stronger protections against fraudulent or conflicted medical evidence, and funded legal representation. The bill imposes new compliance costs and financial security requirements on coal operators, but these are accountability measures that protect the fund and ensure operators pay their fair share rather than shifting costs to taxpayers.
Who stands to gain
- coal miners and their families (primary beneficiaries of increased benefits and faster processing)
- attorneys representing coal miners (capped fee awards of $1,500–$3,000 per claim, funded by the Blac
- physicians conducting independent medical evaluations (new demand for qualified pulmonary specialist
Named in the bill
Department of Labor, Black Lung Disability Trust Fund, Office of Administrative Law Judges, coal mine operators, National Practitioner Data Bank, Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration, Benefits Review Board, coal mining industry
Where it stands
5 cosponsors: 5 Democrats.
- Dec 16, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Dec 16, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Education and Workforce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $150,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 35 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Morgan McGarvey, the sponsor, reported $628,638 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- United Mine Workers of America — $80,000 on 1 filing
- Appalachian Voices — $70,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 17, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (32,501 characters) on Aug 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 17, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Coal miners win faster benefits, higher pay—operators face stricter liability” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr6756 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.