Service members finally get their day in court for military medical malpractice
H.R. 6730 — HERO Act · Filed by Darrell Issa (R-CA) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 16, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows service members and their families to sue the federal government for injuries or deaths caused by negligent or wrongful medical care at military hospitals and clinics. Currently, a 1950s law (the Feres Doctrine) bars such lawsuits; this bill creates a narrow exception for military medical malpractice, with a 10-year statute of limitations and compensation that does not reduce existing VA or military life insurance benefits.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to restore a legal remedy for military medical malpractice by carving out an exception to the Feres Doctrine, a 75-year-old immunity rule. It is fundamentally about accountability and access to courts for a specific class of injured plaintiffs.
What the text implies
- The bill repeals Section 2733a of title 10, which previously governed administrative claims for military medical malpractice. This shifts the remedy from administrative process to federal court litigation, potentially increasing litigation costs and complexity for the government.
- The 10-year statute of limitations is measured from discovery of injury, not from the negligent act itself. This may allow claims for latent injuries (e.g., surgical complications, medication side effects) to be brought years after the incident.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
plaintiff's attorneys (contingency-fee litigation); federal government (indirectly, through accountability incentives for medical quality)