National Parks go domestic-only: gift shops face sourcing mandate
H.R. 6714 — American Products in Parks Act · Filed by Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 15, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires that all products sold in National Park System gift shops and visitor centers be made in the United States—final assembly, significant processing, and virtually all ingredients or components must originate domestically. The Secretary of the Interior has one year to set up certification and audit procedures to enforce the rule.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward sourcing restriction on retail products in a specific venue (NPS gift shops). It is not deregulation, not a tax measure, and not a subsidy—it is a direct mandate favoring domestic production.
What the text implies
- The bill does not define 'virtually all' with precision, creating enforcement ambiguity and potential litigation over borderline products.
- No exemption for products unavailable from U.S. sources, meaning some categories (e.g., certain minerals, specialty goods) may disappear from park shops entirely.
- The one-year implementation window may be insufficient for vendors and manufacturers to restructure supply chains, potentially causing temporary shortages.
- The bill does not address cost pass-through; if domestic sourcing raises product prices significantly, park visitors (often middle-income families) bear the burden.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Park visitors may face reduced product selection and higher prices due to the domestic-only sourcing requirement, offsetting any benefit from supporting U.S. manufacturing. The bill does not address whether domestic producers can meet demand or at what cost, creating uncertainty about net consumer welfare.
Who stands to gain
- domestic manufacturers of gift-shop products (souvenirs, apparel, crafts)
- U.S.-based suppliers of components and raw materials
Named in the bill
National Park System, Secretary of the Interior, gift shops, visitor centers
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 2 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Dec 15, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Dec 15, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (916 characters) on Nov 2, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,927 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-11-02.
“National Parks go domestic-only: gift shops face sourcing mandate” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr6714 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.