Shipping companies get a rate-hike shield in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico
H.R. 666 — Noncontiguous Shipping Reasonable Rate Act of 2024 · Filed by Ed Case (D-HI) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 23, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal maritime law to define what counts as a 'reasonable rate' for shipping to noncontiguous U.S. territories (Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, etc.). Instead of leaving reasonableness to case-by-case judgment, it creates a bright-line rule: any rate within 10% of a comparable international ocean shipping index recognized by the Federal Maritime Commission is automatically deemed reasonable. This benefits shipping companies by narrowing the grounds on which their rates can be challenged as excessive.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a safe harbor for ocean shipping rates. By replacing an open-ended reasonableness standard with a narrow 10% band tied to an international index, it protects shipping companies from regulatory challenge and rate-suppression claims, while reducing transparency and recourse for consumers in noncontiguous territories.
What the text implies
- The 10% band is indexed to international rates, which may themselves be elevated or uncompetitive; tying U.S. reasonableness to an international benchmark may lock in higher prices rather than enforce competitive discipline.
- Noncontiguous territories (Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam) have limited shipping alternatives and captive demand; a safe harbor for rates in these markets may have outsized impact on cost of living and business competitiveness in those regions.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
ocean shipping companies serving noncontiguous U.S. routes; international shipping lines with comparable rate indices