QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal law bans school restraint, mandates parent notification and data transparency

H.R. 6617 — Keeping All Students Safe Act · Filed by Donald Beyer (D-VA) · 49 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 11, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Student Safety and Restraint Accountability

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits schools and Head Start programs from using seclusion or physical restraint on students except in narrow emergency circumstances where the student poses imminent danger of serious injury and less restrictive interventions have failed. It requires schools to report restraint incidents to parents within 24 hours, meet with parents within 5 days, and submit detailed data to the federal government disaggregated by student demographics and disability status. States receive grants to implement crisis intervention training, positive behavioral supports, and mental health services to reduce reliance on restraint.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to establish federal standards prohibiting seclusion and restricting physical restraint in schools and Head Start programs, with mandatory reporting, parent notification, and federal oversight. It is a protective civil-rights measure, not a market-oriented or commemorative bill.

What the text implies

  • Schools may face significant compliance costs for crisis intervention training, data systems, and behavioral support infrastructure, potentially straining budgets in under-resourced districts unless grant funding is adequate.
  • The bill's disaggregation requirements (by race, disability status, economic disadvantage) will expose disparities in restraint use, potentially triggering civil rights investigations or litigation against schools with high rates among protected groups.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Crisis intervention training providers; Behavioral health and mental health service providers; School districts (via federal grants)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record