Congress quietly dismantles consumer protection agency independence
H.R. 654 — TABS Act of 2025 · Filed by Andy Barr (R-KY) · 16 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 23, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill renames the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to the Consumer Financial Empowerment Agency and removes its independent funding mechanism, placing it instead under the regular congressional appropriations process. The Director would be appointed by the President (rather than serving a fixed term), and the agency would lose its dedicated funding stream from the Federal Reserve, making its budget subject to annual congressional approval.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is not a name change—that is cosmetic. The core function is to eliminate the CFPB's independent funding (from Federal Reserve surplus) and subject it to annual congressional appropriations, while making the Director a presidential appointee without fixed tenure. This is a structural dismantling of institutional independence, not a rebranding.
What the text implies
- Removal of independent funding stream (Federal Reserve surplus) makes the agency vulnerable to defunding or budget starvation by Congress, particularly if a party opposes consumer enforcement.
- Presidential appointment of Director without fixed term allows removal at will, eliminating the insulation from political pressure that was central to the CFPB's original design.
- Annual appropriations process creates recurring leverage points for industry lobbying and political negotiation, weakening the agency's ability to pursue enforcement actions against politically connected financial firms.
- The rebranding from 'Bureau' to 'Agency' and 'Protection' to 'Empowerment' is purely cosmetic; the substantive changes are structural defunding and politicization.
- Conforming amendments across 26 federal statutes suggest this is a comprehensive dismantling, not a technical fix—every consumer finance law is being rewritten to reference the new, weaker structure.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens lose institutional independence and funding stability for the agency that enforces consumer financial protections. Moving to annual appropriations creates vulnerability to political defunding or budget cuts, and presidential appointment without term limits weakens the agency's ability to act against politically favored industries. The rebranding as 'Empowerment' masks a structural weakening of enforcement capacity.
Who stands to gain
- insurance companies (AIG, PRU, PFG)
- financial services firms (FBK, FMAO)
- banking and lending industry broadly
Named in the bill
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Consumer Financial Empowerment Agency, Federal Reserve, President, Congress, AIG, FBK, FMAO, PFG, PRU, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Truth in Lending Act — and 3 more
Where it stands
16 cosponsors: 16 Republicans.
- Jan 23, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 23, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
9 lobbying clients named this bill on 15 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $46,473,407 in lobbying spend. A filing names 24 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 89% of bills with at least one filing.
Andy Barr, the sponsor, reported $2,160,072 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $37,710,000 on 2 filings
- American Bankers Association — $5,210,000 on 2 filings
- Consumer Bankers Association — $2,000,000 on 2 filings
- National Treasury Employees Union — $690,000 on 2 filings
- Aca International — $300,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (9,793 characters) on Aug 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress quietly dismantles consumer protection agency independence” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr654 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.