SNAP data now shareable with law enforcement—without recipient consent.
H.R. 6520 — SNAP Data Transparency and Oversight Act of 2025 · Filed by Brad Finstad (R-MN) · 15 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 9, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the SNAP (food assistance) program to require states to provide detailed recipient-level data to the U.S. Department of Agriculture upon request. States must comply within 30 days or face withholding of federal administrative funds. The data can be shared with federal and state law enforcement agencies for program enforcement and fraud investigation.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to expand USDA's authority to demand state-level SNAP recipient data and to permit law enforcement access to that data. It is framed as program integrity and oversight, but the mechanism is a broad data-access grant with minimal privacy guardrails.
What the text implies
- The bill permits data sharing with 'any Federal law enforcement and investigative agency' and state law enforcement without specifying what purposes qualify or requiring a warrant or subpoena, creating a pathway for SNAP recipient data to be used in immigration enforcement, criminal investigations, or other purposes unrelated to SNAP fraud.
- Section (y)(5) defers privacy protection to 'applicable Federal laws and safeguards' without defining which laws apply or how they limit use; the Privacy Act of 1974 has broad law-enforcement exceptions, so this language may not meaningfully constrain disclosure.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Citizens gain potential fraud detection and program integrity oversight, but lose privacy protections: personal SNAP recipient data becomes accessible to federal and state law enforcement without a clear consent or warrant requirement, and the bill does not establish what 'applicable Federal laws and safeguards' actually protect individuals or limit downstream use. The 30-day compliance deadline and funding penalty create pressure on states to comply even if privacy concerns exist.