QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Pentagon gains broad power to direct civilian hospitals during emergencies

H.R. 6510 — National Military Civilian Medical Surge Program Act of 2025 · Filed by Don Bacon (R-NE) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Dec 9, 2025 · Referred to committee

55%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Military-Civilian Emergency Medical…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a formal partnership program between the Department of Defense and civilian hospitals, medical centers, and health organizations to rapidly mobilize civilian medical personnel and resources to support military medical facilities during wars, national emergencies, public health crises, or major disasters. The Defense Department will select at least eight strategic locations across the U.S. (and potentially more) to establish these partnerships, oversee the program through the Uniformed Services University, and report annually to Congress on readiness and capabilities.

Why we flagged it

The bill establishes a formal program of record for integrating civilian medical capacity into military operations during emergencies. It is primarily a defense and public health coordination mechanism, not a tax provision, appropriation, or commemorative measure.

What the text implies

  • The bill grants the Defense Secretary broad discretion to select partnership locations based on undefined 'strategic and operational relevance,' potentially allowing military priorities to override civilian disaster-preparedness needs in location selection.
  • The program may subordinate civilian medical personnel and resources to military command during declared emergencies, contingency operations, or exercises of executive war powers—potentially limiting civilian medical autonomy during public health crises.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

academic medical centers; large hospital systems; nonprofit health care organizations

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record