USDA to pay farmers for tariff losses—but no income limits specified
H.R. 6496 — Specialty Crop & Wine Producer Tariff Relief Act · Filed by Mike Thompson (D-CA) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 5, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the USDA to create a direct-payment program for specialty crop growers and wine producers who suffer losses from tariffs imposed by foreign countries after January 20, 2025. The Secretary may also purchase surplus crops for nutrition assistance programs. Payments are authorized through 2030, with annual reporting to Congress required.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a direct federal payment program narrowly targeted to specialty crop and wine producers experiencing tariff-related losses. This is a subsidy carved out for a specific agricultural sector, not a broad trade or tariff policy.
What the text implies
- The definition of 'covered loss' is broad and includes indirect costs (labor, transport, packaging) that may be difficult to verify or audit, creating potential for over-payment or fraud.
- The bill does not specify eligibility thresholds (farm size, revenue, loss magnitude), meaning very small producers and very large operations may receive equal treatment.
- The surplus-crop purchase authority (subsection b) is discretionary ('may purchase'), not mandatory, so nutrition-assistance benefit is uncertain.
- No sunset or phase-out mechanism; the program runs through 2030 with open-ended appropriations, creating long-term fiscal commitment.
- The bill does not address whether payments will be means-tested or income-limited, potentially directing federal funds to wealthy agricultural operations.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill provides targeted relief to farmers and wine producers facing real economic harm from tariff retaliation, a public-interest outcome. However, the program is narrowly tailored to a specific sector and does not address broader tariff impacts on consumers or other industries; the surplus-crop purchase may modestly benefit nutrition-assistance recipients, but the primary mechanism is sector-specific subsidy.
Who stands to gain
- specialty crop growers
- wine producers
- wine grape producers
Named in the bill
Secretary of Agriculture, USDA, Commodity Credit Corporation, specialty crop growers, wine producers, foreign countries (tariff-imposing), nutrition assistance programs
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 3 Democrats, 3 Republicans.
- Dec 5, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Dec 5, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Agriculture · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,651 characters) on May 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“USDA to pay farmers for tariff losses—but no income limits specified” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr6496 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.