Congress tightens oversight of $2.5B+ infrastructure projects
H.R. 6435 — Transportation Megaprojects Accountability and Oversight Act · Filed by Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Dec 4, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires large transportation projects costing $2.5 billion or more to submit detailed risk management plans, establish independent peer review groups of at least 5 experts to oversee them, and publish project details and engineer credentials online. It also directs the Transportation Research Board to study megaproject problems and recommend improvements to federal oversight within 3 years.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to impose new transparency, risk management, and expert review requirements on federally funded megaprojects. It is fundamentally a governance and accountability measure, not a spending or subsidy bill.
What the text implies
- Peer review groups may slow project timelines by requiring 90-day review cycles after any significant scope/schedule/budget change, potentially increasing overall project duration.
- The requirement to maintain 'financial reserves for addressing known and unknown risks' may increase upfront project costs and reduce funds available for actual construction.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
project management consulting firms; engineering firms specializing in risk assessment; transportation research organizations